ASN Aircraft accident Douglas DC-3C HK-2820 Villavicencio-La Vanguardia Airport (VVC)
ASN logo

Status:Accident investigation report completed and information captured
Date:Thursday 8 July 2021
Type:Silhouette image of generic DC3 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different
Douglas DC-3C
Operator:ALIANSA Colombia
Registration: HK-2820
MSN: 20171
First flight: 1944
Total airframe hrs:18472
Engines: 2 Pratt & Whitney R-1830-92
Crew:Fatalities: 3 / Occupants: 3
Passengers:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 0
Total:Fatalities: 3 / Occupants: 3
Aircraft damage: Destroyed
Aircraft fate: Written off (damaged beyond repair)
Location:13,5 km (8.4 mls) N of Villavicencio-La Vanguardia Airport (VVC) (   Colombia)
Phase: En route (ENR)
Departure airport:Villavicencio-La Vanguardia Airport (VVC/SKVV), Colombia
Destination airport:Villavicencio-La Vanguardia Airport (VVC/SKVV), Colombia
A Douglas DC-3 crashed in a mountainous area after takeoff from Villavicencio-La Vanguardia Airport, Colombia. The aircraft was performing a training flight, carrying an instructor captain, student captain and a maintenance engineer. All three occupants suffered fatal injuries.
At the time of takeoff there was rain over the airfield and low visibility. However, the airfield was operating in visual conditions. The aircraft started engines at the company's facilities at 06:43, and was cleared to taxi to the holding point on runway 05. During the taxi, the crew requested that, after takeoff, it be cleared to fly to the VIDAL position, then to the VOR VVC, join the VOR pattern, and approach Villavicencio. This request was authorized by ATC, as the standard VVC2A instrument departure. The aircraft took off from Vanguardia airport at 06:59 normally and the Tower transferred control of the aircraft to Villavicencio Approach (VVC APP). At 07:08, VVC APP identified on its radar screen that HK-2820 was turning left, outside the DME arc protection 15 miles from VOR VVC, instead of intercepting and continuing the arc to the VIDAL position, as established by VVC2A standard departure. The controller made a call to the aircraft inquiring about the direction of its turn, without receiving any response. At 07:09 radar contact with the aircraft was lost.
The aircraft was found to have crashed in a mountainous area, in the foothills of the Eastern Cordillera, at 6000 feet above mean sea level with a rocky surface and lush vegetation with trees approximately 10 to 15 meters high. The terrain has a slope of approximately 60°; the aircraft was suspended by the trunks of three trees, which prevented it from falling into a precipice.

Probable Cause:

Probable Causes
• Controlled flight into terrain during the execution of the IFR departure procedure VVC2A, during which the crew mistakenly turned left, contrary to the procedure, heading towards the mountainous area at the foothills of the eastern range, where the impact occurred.
• Loss of situational awareness by the crew, which, for reasons that could not be determined, apparently made a controlled left turn, contrary to the indications of the VVC2A departure procedure, even though it was an experienced crew familiar with the operating area.

Contributing Factors
• Lack of operator standards, as there was no detailed, organized, and sequential instructional plan and syllabus for the crew to follow during each maneuver, such as the VVC2A instrument departure.
• Lack of operator standards, as there was no specific syllabus for the planning and execution of the Recurrent Check, taking into account, among other aspects, the composition of the aircraft crew, consisting of two instructor pilots, one of whom was conducting the check on the other.
• Inadequate planning and supervision of the training flight by the operator, as they did not conduct a specific risk analysis of the flight, did not monitor its preparation and execution, did not provide details in a flight order or other document, considering especially the composition of the aircraft crew, consisting of two instructor pilots, one of whom was conducting the check on the other.
• Deficient planning and preparation of the flight by the crew, as they informally changed the VFR Flight Plan to IFR, apparently did not conduct a complete and adequate briefing, were unaware of or did not consider the VVC2A SID for the start of the IFR flight, and omitted several IFR flight procedures.
• Crew's neglect of the following IFR flight procedures:
   - Not specifying a route and an IFR departure procedure in the IFR Flight Plan.
   - Not requesting complete authorization from ATC to initiate an IFR flight. At no time did they mention the VVC2A departure, which was key to the verbally proposed plan before takeoff.
   - Not defining or requesting from ATS which standard departure procedure or other they would use to initiate the IFR flight, in which they would encounter IMC shortly after takeoff.
   - Not requiring ATC to assign a transponder code before takeoff or at any other phase of the flight, or selecting code 2000 as they did not receive instructions from ATS to activate the transponder.
   - Likely not activating the transponder before takeoff and/or not verifying its correct operation before takeoff or immediately once the aircraft was in the air.
   - Inaccurate use of phraseology with non-standard terminology in their transmissions with ATC.
• Insufficient experience and training in IFR flights by the crew, despite their extensive experience with the equipment. Much of this experience had been gained in the eastern region of the country, where the majority of DC3 flights are conducted in VMC and under VFR, with no opportunity for the practical execution of IFR procedures.
• Overconfidence of the crew, influenced by factors such as the high flight experience and DC3 equipment experience of the two pilots in the crew, their status as instructor pilots, the relatively low operational demand of the flight mission, and the knowledge, familiarity, and confidence of both crew members with the aerodrome's characteristics, the surrounding area, and especially the peculiarities and risks of the terrain to the west of the takeoff path.
• Non-observance by air traffic control of the following IFR flight procedures initiated by HK2820:
   - Failure to issue complete authorization to the aircraft for the IFR flight before initiating the flight or at any other time.
   - Failure to issue a standardized instrument departure, SID, or any other safe departure procedure to the aircraft. At no time did ATC mention the VVC2A departure, which was crucial for carrying out the plan verbally proposed by the crew.
   - Failure to provide the aircraft with a transponder code before takeoff or at another appropriate time, or to verify its response. This process started only 03:11 minutes after the aircraft took off, so positive radar contact verification was only achieved 04:58 minutes after takeoff, delaying radar presentation and limiting positive flight control.
   - Late transfer of aircraft control from the Control Tower to Approach Control (03:35 minutes after takeoff), not immediately after the aircraft was airborne as it should have been, considering prevailing IMC flight conditions in the vicinity of the aerodrome.
   - Operating with an incomplete radar display configuration in Approach Control, with insufficient symbology, depriving control of references and judgment elements for an accurate location of the aircraft and its left turn from the path.
   - Failure to observe radar surveillance techniques and procedures.
   - Inaccurate use of phraseology with non-standard terminology in their transmissions with the aircraft.
• Lack of situational awareness by both the crew and ATC during a flight that, perhaps because it seemed routine, led both parties to omit elementary IFR flight procedures, disregarding the inherent risks of an operation in IMC conditions, with strict IFR procedures that needed to be followed, considering, among other things, the aerodrome's proximity to a mountainous area.

Accident investigation:

Investigating agency: Aerocivil Colombia
Status: Investigation completed
Duration: 2 years and 4 months
Accident number: COL-21-30-GIA
Download report: Final report


» Aerocivil

METAR Weather report:
12:00 UTC / 07:00 local time:
SKVV METAR SKVV 081200Z 04004KT 9999 VCSH BKN020 SCT090 22/21 Q1015 RMK VCSH/NE A2998=

13:00 UTC / 08:00 local time:
SKVV METAR SKVV 081300Z 30004KT 8000 -DZ BKN015 SCT090 22/21 Q1016 RMK A3002=

Follow-up / safety actions

Aerocivil issued 14 Safety Recommendations

Show all...


photo of Douglas-DC-3C-HK-2820
accident date: 08-07-2021
type: Douglas DC-3C
registration: HK-2820

Video, social media


This information is not presented as the Flight Safety Foundation or the Aviation Safety Network’s opinion as to the cause of the accident. It is preliminary and is based on the facts as they are known at this time.
languages: languages


Douglas DC-3

  • ca 13.000 built
  • 4594th loss
  • 1822nd fatal accident
  • 20th worst accident
» safety profile

  • 6th worst accident
» safety profile

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2024 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314