Accident McDonnell Douglas MD-88 EC-FPD,
ASN logo
ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 321665
 
This accident is missing citations or reference sources. Please help add citations to guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies.

Date:Thursday 31 July 2008
Time:19:34
Type:Silhouette image of generic MD88 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different    
McDonnell Douglas MD-88
Owner/operator:Iberia
Registration: EC-FPD
MSN: 53309/2023
Year of manufacture:1992
Total airframe hrs:33337 hours
Engine model:Pratt & Whitney JT8D-217C
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 122
Aircraft damage: Substantial, written off
Category:Accident
Location:Wien-Schwechat International Airport (VIE) -   Austria
Phase: Take off
Nature:Passenger - Scheduled
Departure airport:Wien-Schwechat International Airport (VIE/LOWW)
Destination airport:Madrid-Barajas Airport (MAD/LEMD)
Investigating agency: UUS Austria
Confidence Rating: Accident investigation report completed and information captured
Narrative:
On July 31, 2008, a McDonnell Douglas MD-88 passenger plane operated by Iberia, took off from the Vienna Schwechat airport at 19:34 local time. The airplane was operating flight IB-3575 to Madrid, Spain with 116 passengers and six crew members on board.
During the takeoff run immediately before becoming airborne, the left engine experienced loss of power and vibration. The pilots retracted the landing gear, declared an emergency to air traffic control and started to turn downwind towards runway 29 with the intention of landing and climbed to 2000 ft MSL. A burning smell was detected in the cockpit but no smoke was seen and no fire alarm was triggered. The pilots wanted to perform a precautionary landing on runway 29 with a flight mass above the normal permitted value and on downwind they worked through the checklists for "Engine fire or severe damage or separation" and "Emergency return to the field", during which the left engine was shut down. They started the APU and switched on the connected power generator and hydraulic pump. The expected "landing gear extended and locked" indicator did not appear after extending the landing gear.

The pilots then circled and worked through the "Abnormal gear indication with the handle down" checklist, including actuation of the emergency landing gear extension mechanism.
However, the "Landing gear down and locked" indication for the left main landing gear remained off. The pilots then decided not to land and about 8 minutes after takeoff they conducted a low overflight over Vienna-Schwechat Airport at about 500 ft AGL to allow the air traffic controllers in the control tower to check the left landing gear. The pilots were informed that the left landing gear was extended. They then climbed to 5000 ft. In the meantime, the airport operations manager inspected runway 29 and found parts of a tyre and a part of a water deflector. Because of the missing locking indication, the pilots decided to inspect the locking mechanism of the main landing gears with a periscope in the passenger cabin of the aircraft. However, the First Officer, who conducted the inspection, could not obtain any information, because the field of vision was obscured by dirt.
Because the pilots wanted to have the information regarding the main landing gear verified again, 21 minutes after takeoff they flew over the airport a second time at about 400 ft AGL, which gave them the same information as before. The pilots then climbed again south-east of the airport to about 5000 ft to burn more fuel and prepared for landing by working through the "Landing with unsafe landing gear and possible evacuation of the aircraft" checklist.
Once the flight mass had been reduced below the normal allowable landing mass, the pilots decided to land before dark, and decided to land on runway 34, because it was longer than runway 29 and had fewer obstacles on the left side. They were worried that the left landing gear could collapse and requested the presence of the airport fire brigade and a foam carpet, which however was not provided.
One hour and 16 minutes after takeoff the aircraft landed smoothly on runway 34 at 20:50. During the landing, as a result of the actuation of the emergency extension mechanism, the inboard doors of the main landing gear scraped the surface of the runway and caused a shower of sparks. The aircraft left the runway under its own power and stopped at exit 32, where the passengers could exit by stairs.
The pilots, crew and passengers were uninjured. The aircraft was seriously damaged.

Probable causes:
- Disconnection of the electrical components of the proximity switch of the left main landing gear indicator in the left-hand main landing gear well by foreign parts.
- Penetration of foreign parts into the left-hand engine.

Probable contributing factors:
- Valve stem fastening to rim 2 not secured
- Lack of clarity from the company about the additional maintenance work performed in the area of the valve stem when the tyre was replaced.
- Use of a porous O-ring for the valve stem on rim 2.
- Inadequate greasing of the O-ring of the valve stem on rim 2.
- The daily check of tyre 2 on the day of the incident did not detect any pressure drop, as it can be assumed that the tyre pressure was not checked at all.
- Signs of the tread becoming detached on tyre 2 were not recognised during the preflight checks.

Possible contributing factors:
- Incorrect tightening torque used when fastening the valve stem to rim 2 when the tyre was replaced on 11 .7.2008.

Accident investigation:
cover
  
Investigating agency: UUS Austria
Report number: BMVIT-86.047
Status: Investigation completed
Duration: 5 years and 5 months
Download report: Final report

Sources:


Location

Revision history:

Date/timeContributorUpdates

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2024 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
www.FlightSafety.org